Investing in cryptocurrencies comes with significant risk. You could lose all the money you invest. Please read our risk warning here.

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is the buzz that’s reshaping the economics of blockchain protocols. It encapsulates the potential gains that can be captured by those who place, or order, transactions within blockchain blocks—typically miners or validators. This article cuts through the complexities to answer ‘What is maximal extractable value MEV?’ and outlines its multifaceted impact on the blockchain ecosystem from various perspectives, setting the stage for a comprehensive understanding without overwhelming you with details all at once.

Key Takeaways

• Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is the maximum profit miners or validators can earn by manipulating transaction orders in blockchain block production, affecting both user experience and network stability.
• MEV has evolved from being exclusive to miners in proof-of-work systems to encompassing validators in proof-of-stake systems, with MEV searchers playing a crucial role in identifying and executing profitable transaction strategies.
• MEV techniques such as front-running, back-running, sandwich attacks, arbitrage, and liquidations create economic incentives and efficiencies, but they also introduce risks such as consensus instability, increased transaction costs, and degraded user experiences.

Defining Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is the greatest value miners or validators can derive through manipulation of transaction order during block production. Block producers can leverage strategies such as arbitrage to earn profits above standard block rewards and fees by reordering, including, or excluding transactions in a new block.

While MEV may seem like a boon to miners and validators, it’s not without its drawbacks. Due to some extraction techniques that users might consider malicious, MEV can result in a degraded user experience on blockchain networks.

The concept of MEV has considerably evolved from its initial focus on miners in proof-of-work systems to include both miners and validators.

Miner Extractable Value vs. Maximal Extractable Value

The concept of MEV began with the term ‘miner extractable value’ in proof-of-work systems. In these systems, miners had the power to extract extra value by manipulating the order of transactions. However, as blockchain technology evolved, so did the concept of MEV. It expanded to include not just miners but also validators in various network types, including proof-of-stake systems.

In proof-of-stake systems, block builders, including validators, assemble blocks using transaction sets prepared by MEV searchers and submit them to the blockchain network. The change from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake systems meant that MEV was no longer exclusive to miners; validators too could now extract value. This evolution of MEV highlights its adaptability and continued relevance in the ever-evolving landscape of blockchain technology.

The Role of MEV Searchers and Validators

While miners and validators are key players in the MEV landscape, they are not the only ones. Enter the MEV searchers. These independent participants use algorithms to identify potentially lucrative transactions on the blockchain and automate their submission. Validators on the Ethereum blockchain then validate the success of MEV extraction and, in a proof-of-stake system, digitally sign the blocks containing selected profitable transactions.

It resembles a cat-and-mouse game where searchers compete for MEV profits by submitting transactions with elevated fees to secure priority execution over regular transactions. But it’s not just about competition; there’s also collaboration. Searchers often work in tandem with validators, capturing a significant portion of liquidity on decentralized exchanges and enabling them to sell assets at elevated prices.

Independent Network Participants

Crucial players in the MEV landscape, independent network participants, also known as ‘searchers’ – significantly influence the MEV arena. By leveraging algorithms and bots, they extract MEV, influencing transaction priorities and network economics. One such notorious MEV searcher is the bot named Jaredfromsubway.eth. This bot executes profitable strategies in the MEV space, demonstrating the dynamic impact independent actors can have on the overall ecosystem.

These independent searchers have been known to accumulate significant earnings through effective MEV strategies, and their activities serve as a reminder of the potential rewards, and risks, that MEV presents. The actions of these searchers are a testament to the dynamic and diverse nature of the MEV landscape, where a single bot can significantly impact the ecosystem.

The Merge: Transition from PoW to PoS

The switch from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake consensus, referred to as The Merge, has brought about profound implications for MEV. With this transition, MEV now applies not just to miners but to validators as well. This shift is expected to increase the importance of MEV for validators’ income, given the projected rise of MEV in relation to proof-of-stake block rewards. As a result, the ability to capture mev effectively becomes a crucial skill for validators.

The way MEV has changed from a concept only affecting miners in proof-of-work systems to a more general concept affecting validators in proof-of-stake and other network types shows how flexible and useful it is in the ever-changing world of blockchain technology.

Even after The Merge, the term maximal extractable value (MEV) continues to be used to describe value extraction methods in Ethereum, including those that involve mev extraction techniques.

Common MEV Extraction Techniques

Much like a skilled craftsman uses a plethora of tools to master his craft, MEV searchers employ a variety of techniques to derive the maximum value from the blockchain. These techniques include:

• Front-running
• Back-running
• Sandwich attacks
• Liquidations within DeFi protocols
• Exploiting settlement mechanisms in decentralized ledgers

MEV searchers analyze the mempool and may employ chain reorganizations, hiding transactions, or strategically ordering transactions within a block to extract the maximal value. But the games of deception don’t stop there. Generalized front-running occurs when bots submit copied transactions with a higher fee to be included first, often thwarting original transactions and rescue attempts. To detect profitable transactions, these bots rely on advanced algorithms and strategies.

And then there’s the use of Flashbots users who apply sandwich attacks, followed by arbitrage, exploiting MEV opportunities by prioritizing their transactions in the blockchain.

Front-running and Sandwich Attacks

Front-running and sandwich attacks are two common MEV extraction techniques that essentially manipulate prices on decentralized exchanges. Front-running bots are programmed to detect large trades and preemptively place their own orders to capitalize on price movements. On the other hand, in sandwich attack strategies, MEV searchers execute trades before and after a detected large trade to take advantage of the resultant price movement for financial gain.

These aggressive strategies, however, lead to significant problems for everyday users. Increased slippage, poor trade executions, and manipulated prices are just some of the issues users face due to MEV activities like front-running and sandwich attacks.

Decentralized Exchange (DEX) Arbitrage

Imagine that you could buy an asset for a lower price on one exchange and sell it for a higher price on another. That’s the essence of DEX arbitrage, a common MEV extraction technique. Decentralized exchanges can create an arbitrage opportunity when a large trade causes a price deviation for a crypto asset between different exchanges. This allows traders to potentially profit from the price difference.

To capitalize on these arbitrage opportunities, MEV bots buy the asset from the exchange where it’s undervalued and sell it on the exchange where it’s overvalued. By monitoring pending transactions in the mempool, these bots can outmaneuver other traders by copying their trades and paying higher fees. The competition between arbitrage bots intensifies with the growth of decentralized finance, resulting in bidding wars that increase the fees bots are willing to pay for their transactions to be prioritized.

Liquidations and Overcollateralized Loans

Liquidations within DeFi protocols present another avenue for MEV extraction. MEV opportunities arise from:

• Liquidating undercollateralized positions within DeFi protocols, helping sustain their solvency and contributing to the ecological functioning of DeFi lending markets.
• MEV enables rapid liquidations to guarantee lenders are repaid when borrowers’ collateral falls below required ratios.
• It facilitates arbitrage that aligns prices on DEXs with broader market demands, ensuring economic stability in DeFi protocols.

Searchers compete to identify liquidation opportunities where they parse blockchain data for undercollateralized loans to liquidate, earning liquidation fees by being the first to submit transactions in lending protocols like Aave and Maker. Similar to their engagement in arbitrage, MEV bots partake in liquidations, aiming to exploit economically rational actions that not only deliver profits, such as the liquidation fee, but also help maintain the stability of DeFi lending platforms.

Pros and Cons of MEV

Like any other concept, MEV has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, MEV strengthens the DeFi ecosystem by allowing economically rational actors to reduce inefficiencies within individual protocols. It contributes to fixing economic inefficiencies in decentralized applications (dApps).

On the other hand, MEV poses risks such as:

• Consensus instability occurs when the MEV available to block producers exceeds block rewards, providing an incentive to reorganize previous blocks.
• Network congestion, resulting in increased transaction prices.
• End-users may experience a worse experience on decentralized exchanges, facing high slippage and other issues due to MEV activities like front-running and sandwich attacks.

Benefits of MEV

MEV serves as an economic incentive for miners and validators to actively participate in the network, thereby enhancing its security. One of the primary benefits of MEV is its ability to correct economic inefficiencies by ensuring value is extracted from blockchain operations effectively.

MEV contributes to the robustness of decentralized applications (DApps) and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols by allowing for efficient market operations. Through DEX arbitrage, MEV helps in maintaining fair cryptocurrency prices across different DEXs, benefiting end users through more consistent and accurate pricing.

Drawbacks of MEV

While MEV has its perks, it’s not without its drawbacks. For one, significant MEV rewards exceeding the block reward may incentivize validators to reorganize blocks, which can lead to blockchain re-organization and undermine consensus stability. The economic incentives created by MEV could promote behaviors that threaten the integrity of the blockchain, such as:

• miners reorganizing blocks to capture higher fees
• validators colluding to manipulate transaction ordering
• front-running transactions to gain an unfair advantage

These actions can undermine the trust and security of the blockchain system. It is important for developers and stakeholders to consider these risks and implement measures to mitigate them.

Furthermore, to maximize the inclusion of their transactions for potential MEV gains, searchers are willing to pay elevated gas fees, which contributes to network congestion and higher transaction costs for all users. High transaction costs on decentralized exchanges because of front-running bots create an ‘invisible transaction fee,’ reducing the expected token amount users receive. Front-running and other arbitrage bots in MEV can deteriorate the user experience by causing increased slippage and suboptimal trade execution rates on decentralized exchanges.

Mitigating MEV: Solutions and Strategies

The blockchain community has developed a range of strategies to counteract the effects of MEV, as they would for any challenge. These strategies include off-chain settlement, batch transactions, and Chainlink’s Fair Sequencing Services (FSS).

The FairFlow protocol addresses MEV by implementing the following features:

• Auction-based block space allocation
• Randomized transaction ordering
• Specialized roles such as Auction Managers, Order guards, and Privacy Keepers
• Advanced cryptographic techniques to encrypt transaction details prior to execution

These features enhance transaction privacy and curtail MEV, reducing opportunities for manipulation.

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) prevents MEV-driven centralization by dividing block proposing and building responsibilities, enabling a more egalitarian validator ecosystem.

Off-chain Settlement and Batch Transactions

Off-chain settlement is a process where transactions are settled outside the blockchain and later submitted in a single batch. All transactions in off-chain settlement are settled with the same price regardless of the order, which can prevent MEV actors from prioritizing or reordering transactions to extract value.

DApp users can sign the transactions and submit their trades with order preferences off-chain, complicating the process for validators or miners looking to profit by reorganizing transactions on-chain.

Chainlink's Fair Sequencing Services (FSS)

Chainlink Fair Sequencing Services (FSS) is a transaction ordering solution using decentralized oracle networks. The FSS operates by first gathering user transactions off-chain. Then, it proceeds to create decentralized consensus for ordering the transactions before submitting them on-chain.

Chainlink’s FSS can help reduce MEV by:

• Using decentralized oracle networks to ensure transactions are ordered in a fair and predictable manner
• Applying this to layer-2 rollups to scale the smart contract economy
• Having Auction Managers within FairFlow oversee an auction process for block space allocation
• Conducting the auction process off-chain to achieve a fair and transparent distribution of block space.

The Future of MEV: Challenges and Opportunities

As the blockchain arena evolves, the future of MEV follows suit. The transition to proof-of-stake and scaling efforts using rollups are creating significant changes in the MEV landscape, with implications for MEV dynamics, validator revenue, and competition.

However, the future of MEV isn’t without its challenges. New MEV strategies may emerge, such as censorship-as-a-service or giving preferential treatment to certain transactions, which pose concerns for the network’s integrity. On the flip side, cross-chain technology, like that provided by UniswapX, is becoming increasingly important in facilitating cross-chain MEV extraction while aiming to minimize value leakage.

The MEV market is anticipated to become connected to more complex trading scenarios, offering additional opportunities for traders.

Validator Centralization Risks

One potential challenge the future of MEV might present is the risk of validator centralization in PoS systems due to economies of scale. Larger staking pools may dominate by capturing more MEV and reinvesting earnings into more validators.

With fewer resources at their disposal, solo stakers may be unable to profit from MEV opportunities, which may increase the pressure on independent validators to join powerful staking pools to boost their earnings.

This potential centralization of power amongst a few large staking pools poses a significant risk to the decentralized nature of blockchain networks.

Emerging MEV Opportunities on Other Blockchains

Although MEV has been mainly linked with Ethereum, the landscape is undergoing changes. MEV opportunities have expanded beyond the Ethereum ecosystem to encompass other blockchain networks. Cross-chain transactions are introducing more complex MEV activities, amplifying the possibilities for searchers in different blockchain environments.

Alongside the growth of the DeFi ecosystem, MEV opportunities have also surged on blockchain networks apart from Ethereum. In the NFT space, an example of MEV happened when a buyer spent $7 million to buy all the cryptopunks available at the price floor. This illustrates the impact of MEVs on the market. Searchers have applied MEV extraction strategies in the NFT market, such as exploiting price floor purchases or capitalizing on improperly listed NFTs.

Summary

The landscape of blockchain is ever-evolving, and MEV has emerged as a significant player in this dynamic ecosystem. Through various techniques, MEV searchers and validators extract value, affecting not only the economy of the blockchain but also the user experience. While MEV presents benefits, such as economic incentives for miners and validators and the correction of economic inefficiencies, it also poses challenges, including consensus instability and network congestion.

As we look forward, we see a future filled with both challenges and opportunities. From validator centralization risks to emerging MEV opportunities on other blockchains, the future of MEV is as dynamic as the technology it’s built on. As we continue to navigate this landscape, staying informed and proactive is key. After all, in the world of blockchain, knowledge is power.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)?

MEV, or Maximal Extractable Value, is the maximum value that miners or validators can gain through manipulating transaction orders during block production.

What is the role of MEV searchers?

The role of MEV searchers is to independently use algorithms to identify profitable transactions on the blockchain and automate their submission. This helps them seek out potential opportunities for profit on the blockchain.

What are some common MEV extraction techniques?

Some common MEV extraction techniques include front-running, back-running, sandwich attacks, liquidations within DeFi protocols, and exploiting settlement mechanisms in decentralized ledgers. These techniques can be used to exploit vulnerabilities and gain unfair advantages in the market.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of MEVs?

MEV provides benefits by improving the DeFi ecosystem's efficiency, but it also comes with drawbacks like potential consensus instability and network congestion. Be mindful of both when considering MEVs.

What is the future of MEVs?

The future of MEV includes challenges such as validator centralization risks and opportunities like MEV extraction on other blockchains. It's important to consider these factors while anticipating its development.