Sustainability Challenges Threaten Bitcoin Layer 2 Rollups

A recent report from Galaxy Research has raised significant concerns about the long-term sustainability of Bitcoin Layer 2 scaling solutions, particularly rollups.
Dot
August 5, 2024
Dean Fankhauser

Dean has an economics and startup background which led him to create Bitcompare. He primarly writes opinion pieces for Bitcompare. He's also been a guest on BBC World, and interviewed by The Guardian and many other publications.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A recent report from Galaxy Research has raised significant concerns about the long-term sustainability of Bitcoin Layer 2 scaling solutions, particularly rollups. Despite their growing popularity for enabling cheaper, faster, and more decentralized Bitcoin transactions, the report highlights critical challenges that could hinder their viability.

Key Findings of the Galaxy Research Report

Published on August 2, 2024, the report by Galaxy analyst Gabe Parker emphasizes that Bitcoin rollups face a fundamental issue related to the costs of posting data back to the Bitcoin blockchain. Rollups work by aggregating multiple transactions into a single batch, which is then summarized and posted to the main blockchain. This process is essential for maintaining the state of the rollup and ensuring that any Bitcoin node can reconstruct the latest state of the network.

However, the Bitcoin blockchain has a storage capacity limit of 4 megabytes (MB) per block. Each transaction can consume up to 400 kilobytes (0.4 MB) of block space, which means that posting data for rollups can quickly occupy a significant portion of a block—potentially up to 10%. As multiple rollups compete to post their data every six to eight blocks, the demand for block space could drive up base-layer fees, making it increasingly expensive for rollups to operate.

Financial Implications

The report outlines the financial burden that rollups may face in both low- and high-fee environments. In a scenario where transaction fees are around ten satoshis per virtual byte (sat/VB), rollups could incur monthly expenses of approximately $460,000 to maintain their operations. In a high-fee environment, where fees reach 50 sat/VB, these costs could escalate to around $2.3 million monthly. This financial strain necessitates that rollups generate substantial revenue from transaction fees to remain viable.

Competitive Landscape

As the competition among rollups intensifies, only the most efficient and revenue-generating projects are expected to survive. Galaxy Research estimates that there are currently around 65 rollup projects in development, but the constraints of block space and fee markets could prevent all of them from launching successfully. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy, noted that the competition for block space could lead to higher transaction fees for all users, including those utilizing rollups.

Alternative Solutions and Opinions

In response to the sustainability concerns raised in the report, some industry figures are advocating for alternative approaches. Alexei Zamyatin, co-founder of Build on Bitcoin (BOB), argues that Bitcoin rollups can be as cost-effective as Ethereum rollups, suggesting that using Bitcoin's main chain for data availability may not be the best strategy. He proposes utilizing other technologies, such as Celestia or merge-mined Bitcoin sidechains, which could provide cheaper data availability while sacrificing some degree of decentralization and security.

Zamyatin also believes that rollups could adopt optimistic verification methods, which would reduce the frequency of data postings to the main chain, thus alleviating some of the cost pressures. He emphasized that if Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions are significantly more expensive than their Ethereum counterparts, they may struggle to attract users.

The Galaxy Research report underscores the pressing sustainability challenges facing Bitcoin rollups as they strive to provide efficient scaling solutions. The high costs associated with data posting, coupled with increasing competition for block space, could threaten the long-term viability of these Layer 2 networks. As the Bitcoin ecosystem continues to evolve, developers and stakeholders will need to explore innovative solutions to ensure that rollups can operate sustainably while meeting the demands of users.

Sustainability Challenges Threaten Bitcoin Layer 2 Rollups

HomeNews
Contents

A recent report from Galaxy Research has raised significant concerns about the long-term sustainability of Bitcoin Layer 2 scaling solutions, particularly rollups. Despite their growing popularity for enabling cheaper, faster, and more decentralized Bitcoin transactions, the report highlights critical challenges that could hinder their viability.

Key Findings of the Galaxy Research Report

Published on August 2, 2024, the report by Galaxy analyst Gabe Parker emphasizes that Bitcoin rollups face a fundamental issue related to the costs of posting data back to the Bitcoin blockchain. Rollups work by aggregating multiple transactions into a single batch, which is then summarized and posted to the main blockchain. This process is essential for maintaining the state of the rollup and ensuring that any Bitcoin node can reconstruct the latest state of the network.

However, the Bitcoin blockchain has a storage capacity limit of 4 megabytes (MB) per block. Each transaction can consume up to 400 kilobytes (0.4 MB) of block space, which means that posting data for rollups can quickly occupy a significant portion of a block—potentially up to 10%. As multiple rollups compete to post their data every six to eight blocks, the demand for block space could drive up base-layer fees, making it increasingly expensive for rollups to operate.

Financial Implications

The report outlines the financial burden that rollups may face in both low- and high-fee environments. In a scenario where transaction fees are around ten satoshis per virtual byte (sat/VB), rollups could incur monthly expenses of approximately $460,000 to maintain their operations. In a high-fee environment, where fees reach 50 sat/VB, these costs could escalate to around $2.3 million monthly. This financial strain necessitates that rollups generate substantial revenue from transaction fees to remain viable.

Competitive Landscape

As the competition among rollups intensifies, only the most efficient and revenue-generating projects are expected to survive. Galaxy Research estimates that there are currently around 65 rollup projects in development, but the constraints of block space and fee markets could prevent all of them from launching successfully. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy, noted that the competition for block space could lead to higher transaction fees for all users, including those utilizing rollups.

Alternative Solutions and Opinions

In response to the sustainability concerns raised in the report, some industry figures are advocating for alternative approaches. Alexei Zamyatin, co-founder of Build on Bitcoin (BOB), argues that Bitcoin rollups can be as cost-effective as Ethereum rollups, suggesting that using Bitcoin's main chain for data availability may not be the best strategy. He proposes utilizing other technologies, such as Celestia or merge-mined Bitcoin sidechains, which could provide cheaper data availability while sacrificing some degree of decentralization and security.

Zamyatin also believes that rollups could adopt optimistic verification methods, which would reduce the frequency of data postings to the main chain, thus alleviating some of the cost pressures. He emphasized that if Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions are significantly more expensive than their Ethereum counterparts, they may struggle to attract users.

The Galaxy Research report underscores the pressing sustainability challenges facing Bitcoin rollups as they strive to provide efficient scaling solutions. The high costs associated with data posting, coupled with increasing competition for block space, could threaten the long-term viability of these Layer 2 networks. As the Bitcoin ecosystem continues to evolve, developers and stakeholders will need to explore innovative solutions to ensure that rollups can operate sustainably while meeting the demands of users.

Dean Fankhauser

Dean has an economics and startup background which led him to create Bitcompare. He primarly writes opinion pieces for Bitcompare. He's also been a guest on BBC World, and interviewed by The Guardian and many other publications.

A recent report from Galaxy Research has raised significant concerns about the long-term sustainability of Bitcoin Layer 2 scaling solutions, particularly rollups. Despite their growing popularity for enabling cheaper, faster, and more decentralized Bitcoin transactions, the report highlights critical challenges that could hinder their viability.

Key Findings of the Galaxy Research Report

Published on August 2, 2024, the report by Galaxy analyst Gabe Parker emphasizes that Bitcoin rollups face a fundamental issue related to the costs of posting data back to the Bitcoin blockchain. Rollups work by aggregating multiple transactions into a single batch, which is then summarized and posted to the main blockchain. This process is essential for maintaining the state of the rollup and ensuring that any Bitcoin node can reconstruct the latest state of the network.

However, the Bitcoin blockchain has a storage capacity limit of 4 megabytes (MB) per block. Each transaction can consume up to 400 kilobytes (0.4 MB) of block space, which means that posting data for rollups can quickly occupy a significant portion of a block—potentially up to 10%. As multiple rollups compete to post their data every six to eight blocks, the demand for block space could drive up base-layer fees, making it increasingly expensive for rollups to operate.

Financial Implications

The report outlines the financial burden that rollups may face in both low- and high-fee environments. In a scenario where transaction fees are around ten satoshis per virtual byte (sat/VB), rollups could incur monthly expenses of approximately $460,000 to maintain their operations. In a high-fee environment, where fees reach 50 sat/VB, these costs could escalate to around $2.3 million monthly. This financial strain necessitates that rollups generate substantial revenue from transaction fees to remain viable.

Competitive Landscape

As the competition among rollups intensifies, only the most efficient and revenue-generating projects are expected to survive. Galaxy Research estimates that there are currently around 65 rollup projects in development, but the constraints of block space and fee markets could prevent all of them from launching successfully. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy, noted that the competition for block space could lead to higher transaction fees for all users, including those utilizing rollups.

Alternative Solutions and Opinions

In response to the sustainability concerns raised in the report, some industry figures are advocating for alternative approaches. Alexei Zamyatin, co-founder of Build on Bitcoin (BOB), argues that Bitcoin rollups can be as cost-effective as Ethereum rollups, suggesting that using Bitcoin's main chain for data availability may not be the best strategy. He proposes utilizing other technologies, such as Celestia or merge-mined Bitcoin sidechains, which could provide cheaper data availability while sacrificing some degree of decentralization and security.

Zamyatin also believes that rollups could adopt optimistic verification methods, which would reduce the frequency of data postings to the main chain, thus alleviating some of the cost pressures. He emphasized that if Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions are significantly more expensive than their Ethereum counterparts, they may struggle to attract users.

The Galaxy Research report underscores the pressing sustainability challenges facing Bitcoin rollups as they strive to provide efficient scaling solutions. The high costs associated with data posting, coupled with increasing competition for block space, could threaten the long-term viability of these Layer 2 networks. As the Bitcoin ecosystem continues to evolve, developers and stakeholders will need to explore innovative solutions to ensure that rollups can operate sustainably while meeting the demands of users.

Written by
Dean Fankhauser