SEC Reinforces Bid Blocking Ripple From Getting Evidence In XRP Lawsuit

The SEC moves to prevent Ripple from getting hold of a 2018 William Hinman speech, stating that Ethereum is not a security.
Dot
January 29, 2023
Chiagoziem Bede Ikwueze

Chiagoziem has gathered a wealth of experience, having worked for many prominent crypto-based businesses, including Revain, Whiteboard Crypto, DeRev, The Crypto Cartel, Crypto News, MoneySwitch, Full Value Dan, and Bitcompare. Over the past couple of years, his works have been featured in many publications and places. When he is not writing, he spends time working on his other digital businesses, playing video games, reading books, watching movies, and most importantly, enjoying quality time with loved ones.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SEC stated, "The speech drafts have no relevance to the claims or defenses in this case. They are non-public internal documents that the defendants (and other market participants) have never seen."

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is stepping up its efforts to prevent Ripple Labs from obtaining critical evidence in the lawsuit filed against the payments firm, alleging that it sold XRP as an unregistered security.

The SEC says in a recent court filing that it is adding to its earlier objection to a court order compelling the regulatory agency to reveal the draft of a speech given by its former Director of Corporate Finance, William Hinman.

The speech in question is about remarks made by Hinman in 2018, where he stated that Ethereum (ETH) was not a security.

However, the SEC insists the speech drafts sought by Ripple are only for internal consumption and are thus irrelevant to the lawsuit, alleging that XRP is an unregistered security.

In their words,

“The speech drafts have no relevance to the claims or defenses in this case. They are non-public internal documents that the defendants (and other market participants) have never seen."

The SEC claims that even if the speech drafts were relevant to the case, they are protected documents and should be withheld from Ripple.

According to the SEC, the speech drafts are pre-decisional because they were Hinman's opinions rather than the SEC's, and they predate any decision made by the Commission concerning Ripple and XRP.

Furthermore, the regulatory agency claims that the drafts are deliberative because they were intended for potential use in the formulation of future policy rather than existing policy.

SEC Reinforces Bid Blocking Ripple From Getting Evidence In XRP Lawsuit

HomeCrypto regulation
Contents
The SEC stated, "The speech drafts have no relevance to the claims or defenses in this case. They are non-public internal documents that the defendants (and other market participants) have never seen."

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is stepping up its efforts to prevent Ripple Labs from obtaining critical evidence in the lawsuit filed against the payments firm, alleging that it sold XRP as an unregistered security.

The SEC says in a recent court filing that it is adding to its earlier objection to a court order compelling the regulatory agency to reveal the draft of a speech given by its former Director of Corporate Finance, William Hinman.

The speech in question is about remarks made by Hinman in 2018, where he stated that Ethereum (ETH) was not a security.

However, the SEC insists the speech drafts sought by Ripple are only for internal consumption and are thus irrelevant to the lawsuit, alleging that XRP is an unregistered security.

In their words,

“The speech drafts have no relevance to the claims or defenses in this case. They are non-public internal documents that the defendants (and other market participants) have never seen."

The SEC claims that even if the speech drafts were relevant to the case, they are protected documents and should be withheld from Ripple.

According to the SEC, the speech drafts are pre-decisional because they were Hinman's opinions rather than the SEC's, and they predate any decision made by the Commission concerning Ripple and XRP.

Furthermore, the regulatory agency claims that the drafts are deliberative because they were intended for potential use in the formulation of future policy rather than existing policy.

Chiagoziem Bede Ikwueze

Chiagoziem has gathered a wealth of experience, having worked for many prominent crypto-based businesses, including Revain, Whiteboard Crypto, DeRev, The Crypto Cartel, Crypto News, MoneySwitch, Full Value Dan, and Bitcompare. Over the past couple of years, his works have been featured in many publications and places. When he is not writing, he spends time working on his other digital businesses, playing video games, reading books, watching movies, and most importantly, enjoying quality time with loved ones.

The SEC stated, "The speech drafts have no relevance to the claims or defenses in this case. They are non-public internal documents that the defendants (and other market participants) have never seen."

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is stepping up its efforts to prevent Ripple Labs from obtaining critical evidence in the lawsuit filed against the payments firm, alleging that it sold XRP as an unregistered security.

The SEC says in a recent court filing that it is adding to its earlier objection to a court order compelling the regulatory agency to reveal the draft of a speech given by its former Director of Corporate Finance, William Hinman.

The speech in question is about remarks made by Hinman in 2018, where he stated that Ethereum (ETH) was not a security.

However, the SEC insists the speech drafts sought by Ripple are only for internal consumption and are thus irrelevant to the lawsuit, alleging that XRP is an unregistered security.

In their words,

“The speech drafts have no relevance to the claims or defenses in this case. They are non-public internal documents that the defendants (and other market participants) have never seen."

The SEC claims that even if the speech drafts were relevant to the case, they are protected documents and should be withheld from Ripple.

According to the SEC, the speech drafts are pre-decisional because they were Hinman's opinions rather than the SEC's, and they predate any decision made by the Commission concerning Ripple and XRP.

Furthermore, the regulatory agency claims that the drafts are deliberative because they were intended for potential use in the formulation of future policy rather than existing policy.

Written by
Chiagoziem Bede Ikwueze