Celsius Files $3.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tether Over Alleged Bitcoin Mismanagement

Defunct cryptocurrency exchange Celsius has initiated a lawsuit against Tether, seeking approximately $3.5 billion in returns, damages, and legal fees related to Bitcoin collateral.
Dot
August 11, 2024
Dean Fankhauser

Dean has an economics and startup background which led him to create Bitcompare. He primarly writes opinion pieces for Bitcompare. He's also been a guest on BBC World, and interviewed by The Guardian and many other publications.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Defunct cryptocurrency exchange Celsius has initiated a lawsuit against Tether, seeking approximately $3.5 billion in returns, damages, and legal fees related to Bitcoin collateral. The lawsuit alleges misappropriation of assets and claims that Tether improperly liquidated Celsius' Bitcoin holdings during the exchange's bankruptcy proceedings.

Details of the Lawsuit

Celsius asserts that during its bankruptcy, Tether provided a loan in USDT, its stablecoin, in exchange for collateral in the form of 39,542.42 BTC. As Bitcoin's price fell, Celsius was required to post additional collateral to avoid liquidation, which it claims it was not given the chance to do. According to the lawsuit, Tether liquidated the BTC at a price that nearly covered Celsius' debt without allowing the exchange to provide further collateral.

The lawsuit specifies that Celsius is seeking the return of 57,428.64 BTC or its current market value, which is approximately $3.48 billion based on Bitcoin's price of $60,627 as of August 10. The total amount sought includes not only the BTC initially sent to Tether but also additional transfers that Celsius wants voided, amounting to 15,658.21 BTC and 2,228.01 BTC.

Tether's Response

Tether has strongly denied the allegations, describing the lawsuit as baseless and a "shake down." In a blog post, the company stated that it would "vigorously defend" itself against what it calls "unwarranted allegations." Tether contends that the liquidation of Celsius' collateral was not a violation of their agreement but rather a result of Celsius' own decision not to provide additional collateral. Tether claims that Celsius directed them to liquidate the BTC collateral to settle its outstanding position of approximately $815 million in USDT.

Implications for Stakeholders

Despite the ongoing legal battle, Tether has reassured its stakeholders, emphasizing its strong financial position with $12 billion in consolidated equity. The company stated that even in the unlikely event the lawsuit progresses, Tether token holders would not be adversely affected.

Legal and Financial Context

The legal proceedings come amid a turbulent period for Celsius, which filed for bankruptcy in July 2022. The exchange's collapse has raised questions about the management of customer assets and the overall stability of cryptocurrency exchanges. The lawsuit against Tether highlights the complexities of collateral agreements in the volatile crypto market, where price fluctuations can lead to rapid changes in asset management and liquidation practices.

The amounts cited in the lawsuit have sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community regarding the responsibilities of both lenders and borrowers in collateralized loans. As the case unfolds, it may set important precedents for how similar disputes are handled in the future.

Celsius' lawsuit against Tether represents a significant legal challenge in the cryptocurrency space, with potential implications for both companies and their stakeholders. As both parties prepare for court, the outcome of this case could influence future practices regarding collateral management and the responsibilities of cryptocurrency exchanges in volatile market conditions. The situation remains dynamic, with further developments expected as the legal proceedings advance.

Celsius Files $3.5 Billion Lawsuit Against Tether Over Alleged Bitcoin Mismanagement

HomeNews
Contents

Defunct cryptocurrency exchange Celsius has initiated a lawsuit against Tether, seeking approximately $3.5 billion in returns, damages, and legal fees related to Bitcoin collateral. The lawsuit alleges misappropriation of assets and claims that Tether improperly liquidated Celsius' Bitcoin holdings during the exchange's bankruptcy proceedings.

Details of the Lawsuit

Celsius asserts that during its bankruptcy, Tether provided a loan in USDT, its stablecoin, in exchange for collateral in the form of 39,542.42 BTC. As Bitcoin's price fell, Celsius was required to post additional collateral to avoid liquidation, which it claims it was not given the chance to do. According to the lawsuit, Tether liquidated the BTC at a price that nearly covered Celsius' debt without allowing the exchange to provide further collateral.

The lawsuit specifies that Celsius is seeking the return of 57,428.64 BTC or its current market value, which is approximately $3.48 billion based on Bitcoin's price of $60,627 as of August 10. The total amount sought includes not only the BTC initially sent to Tether but also additional transfers that Celsius wants voided, amounting to 15,658.21 BTC and 2,228.01 BTC.

Tether's Response

Tether has strongly denied the allegations, describing the lawsuit as baseless and a "shake down." In a blog post, the company stated that it would "vigorously defend" itself against what it calls "unwarranted allegations." Tether contends that the liquidation of Celsius' collateral was not a violation of their agreement but rather a result of Celsius' own decision not to provide additional collateral. Tether claims that Celsius directed them to liquidate the BTC collateral to settle its outstanding position of approximately $815 million in USDT.

Implications for Stakeholders

Despite the ongoing legal battle, Tether has reassured its stakeholders, emphasizing its strong financial position with $12 billion in consolidated equity. The company stated that even in the unlikely event the lawsuit progresses, Tether token holders would not be adversely affected.

Legal and Financial Context

The legal proceedings come amid a turbulent period for Celsius, which filed for bankruptcy in July 2022. The exchange's collapse has raised questions about the management of customer assets and the overall stability of cryptocurrency exchanges. The lawsuit against Tether highlights the complexities of collateral agreements in the volatile crypto market, where price fluctuations can lead to rapid changes in asset management and liquidation practices.

The amounts cited in the lawsuit have sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community regarding the responsibilities of both lenders and borrowers in collateralized loans. As the case unfolds, it may set important precedents for how similar disputes are handled in the future.

Celsius' lawsuit against Tether represents a significant legal challenge in the cryptocurrency space, with potential implications for both companies and their stakeholders. As both parties prepare for court, the outcome of this case could influence future practices regarding collateral management and the responsibilities of cryptocurrency exchanges in volatile market conditions. The situation remains dynamic, with further developments expected as the legal proceedings advance.

Dean Fankhauser

Dean has an economics and startup background which led him to create Bitcompare. He primarly writes opinion pieces for Bitcompare. He's also been a guest on BBC World, and interviewed by The Guardian and many other publications.

Defunct cryptocurrency exchange Celsius has initiated a lawsuit against Tether, seeking approximately $3.5 billion in returns, damages, and legal fees related to Bitcoin collateral. The lawsuit alleges misappropriation of assets and claims that Tether improperly liquidated Celsius' Bitcoin holdings during the exchange's bankruptcy proceedings.

Details of the Lawsuit

Celsius asserts that during its bankruptcy, Tether provided a loan in USDT, its stablecoin, in exchange for collateral in the form of 39,542.42 BTC. As Bitcoin's price fell, Celsius was required to post additional collateral to avoid liquidation, which it claims it was not given the chance to do. According to the lawsuit, Tether liquidated the BTC at a price that nearly covered Celsius' debt without allowing the exchange to provide further collateral.

The lawsuit specifies that Celsius is seeking the return of 57,428.64 BTC or its current market value, which is approximately $3.48 billion based on Bitcoin's price of $60,627 as of August 10. The total amount sought includes not only the BTC initially sent to Tether but also additional transfers that Celsius wants voided, amounting to 15,658.21 BTC and 2,228.01 BTC.

Tether's Response

Tether has strongly denied the allegations, describing the lawsuit as baseless and a "shake down." In a blog post, the company stated that it would "vigorously defend" itself against what it calls "unwarranted allegations." Tether contends that the liquidation of Celsius' collateral was not a violation of their agreement but rather a result of Celsius' own decision not to provide additional collateral. Tether claims that Celsius directed them to liquidate the BTC collateral to settle its outstanding position of approximately $815 million in USDT.

Implications for Stakeholders

Despite the ongoing legal battle, Tether has reassured its stakeholders, emphasizing its strong financial position with $12 billion in consolidated equity. The company stated that even in the unlikely event the lawsuit progresses, Tether token holders would not be adversely affected.

Legal and Financial Context

The legal proceedings come amid a turbulent period for Celsius, which filed for bankruptcy in July 2022. The exchange's collapse has raised questions about the management of customer assets and the overall stability of cryptocurrency exchanges. The lawsuit against Tether highlights the complexities of collateral agreements in the volatile crypto market, where price fluctuations can lead to rapid changes in asset management and liquidation practices.

The amounts cited in the lawsuit have sparked discussions within the cryptocurrency community regarding the responsibilities of both lenders and borrowers in collateralized loans. As the case unfolds, it may set important precedents for how similar disputes are handled in the future.

Celsius' lawsuit against Tether represents a significant legal challenge in the cryptocurrency space, with potential implications for both companies and their stakeholders. As both parties prepare for court, the outcome of this case could influence future practices regarding collateral management and the responsibilities of cryptocurrency exchanges in volatile market conditions. The situation remains dynamic, with further developments expected as the legal proceedings advance.

Written by
Dean Fankhauser