새로움Bitcompare Yield API와 MCP가 개발자와 AI 에이전트에게 실시간 암호화폐 수익률 데이터에 대한 접근을 제공합니다.
Staked USN logo

Staked USN (SUSN) Interest Rates

Staked USN의 대출, 스테이킹, 차입 금리를 비교하세요

면책 조항: 이 페이지에는 제휴 링크가 포함될 수 있습니다. Bitcompare는 링크를 방문하실 경우 보상을 받을 수 있습니다. 자세한 내용은 저희의 광고 공지를 참조하시기 바랍니다.

현재 최고의 SUSN 이자율은 Pendle에서 8.69% APY입니다. 1 플랫폼에서 평균 SUSN 대출 금리는 8.69% APY입니다. 아래에서 모든 SUSN 대출 금리를 나란히 비교할 수 있습니다.

The highest Staked USN lending rate is 8.69% APY on Pendle. Rates tracked across 1 platforms.

Best SUSN Interest Rates

Lending
8.69% APY
on Pendle

Comparing SUSN rates across 1 platforms to find you the best yields.

최신 Staked USN (SUSN) 이자율

Staked USN (SUSN) Lending Rates

모든 Lending rates 1를 확인하세요.
플랫폼작업최고 금리기본 금리최소 예치금잠금 기간KR 이용 가능 여부
Pendle플랫폼으로 이동8.69% APY———약관 확인
2026년 9월 26일에 제공업체가 표시한 요율

SUSN Lending Rates 시장 요약

평균 금리
8.69%APY
최고 금리
8.69%APY
Pendle
추적 플랫폼
1
최적 위험 조정
8.69%APY
Pendle

이 데이터에 대한 프로그래밍 액세스가 필요하신가요?

Bitcompare Pro API를 통해 실시간 수익률을 확인하세요. 월 10,000 요청 무료.

암호화폐 수익 API 탐색하기

Staked USN 구매 가이드

Staked USN (SUSN)에 대한 자주 묻는 질문

What are the geographic and account-level eligibility rules for lending Staked USN (sUSN), and are there minimum deposits or KYC requirements to participate?
Lending Staked USN (sUSN) typically follows platform-specific eligibility rules that can vary by region and service. Based on available data, sUSN has a circulating supply of about 19.13 million and a market cap around $22.1 million, with activity concentrated on Ethereum, zkSync, and TAC networks. Platforms offering sUSN lending often require standard KYC for larger deposits or institutional clients, and some markets may restrict access for certain jurisdictions due to regulatory compliance. While the core token itself has no universal global ban, expect minimum deposit thresholds and tiered KYC levels to apply: lower tiers for smaller deposits (potentially low or zero KYC in some markets) and higher tiers requiring full KYC for larger positions. If you’re near a platform’s customer onboarding, check the specific lending product terms for sUSN, as some services may enforce regional restrictions or eligibility constraints tied to the token’s liquidity on networks like Ethereum, zkSync, and TAC. Note: current price is around $1.16 with modest daily volume ($111,704) and an upward price movement of ~0.17% in the last 24h, which can influence eligibility thresholds for large lenders.
What risk tradeoffs should I consider when lending Staked USN (sUSN), including lockups, platform insolvency risk, and rate volatility?
Lending Staked USN involves several risk considerations. sUSN has a current price near $1.16 and a 24h price change of roughly 0.17%, indicating modest short-term volatility relative to many high-risk assets. Lockup periods may apply depending on the platform and product; longer lockups can offer higher yields but reduce liquidity. Platform insolvency risk exists in any lending marketplace, especially with newer tokens and specialized layers like zkSync or TAC where risk controls may vary by protocol and counterparty. Smart contract risk is present on DeFi rails and cross-chain bridges that support sUSN; audits, incident history, and the reputation of the lending protocol should be reviewed. Rate volatility can arise from changes in supply-demand dynamics and token liquidity across Ethereum, zkSync, and TAC. To evaluate risk vs reward, compare target yield offers against potential losses from smart contract exploits, counterparty default, or liquidity shocks. As of now, sUSN’s market data shows modest daily volume (about $111.7k) and a circulating supply of ~19.13 million, which informs liquidity risk and potential slippage during unwinds.
How is the yield for lending Staked USN (sUSN) generated, and do rates differ by platform or mechanism (rehypothecation, DeFi protocols, or institutional lending)?
Yield on Staked USN lending is typically produced through a mix of DeFi and centralized lending channels. In practice, platforms may pool sUSN liquidity across networks (Ethereum, zkSync, TAC) and rely on DeFi lending protocols, over-collateralized pools, or rehypothecation practices to generate interest for lenders. Some products offer fixed or variable rates, with fixed-rate options common in more regulated or custodial environments and variable rates prevailing in permissionless DeFi exposures. Compounding frequency varies by platform, often monthly or daily for active markets, depending on how interest accrues (on-chain accrual versus daily settlement). Present data notes: sUSN trades around $1.16 with a 24h volume of about $111,704 and total supply equal to circulating supply (≈19.13 million). These metrics imply liquidity depth that can influence compounding opportunities and price impact when adjusting positions. When choosing a lending path, verify whether the platform supports auto-compounding, how often yields are paid, and whether yields are governed by protocol-native mechanisms or depend on external liquidity providers.
What unique insight or differentiator does Staked USN offer in its lending market based on current data (e.g., notable rate changes, platform coverage, or market-specific insights)?
Staked USN distinguishes itself by its multi-network presence and relatively recent liquidity profile. Data shows sUSN is available across Ethereum, zkSync, and TAC, supported by a total market cap of about $22.1 million and a circulating supply of roughly 19.13 million. The token trades near $1.16 with a small 24h price change (~0.17%), suggesting a stable peg-like behavior within its range. A notable differentiator is its cross-layer liquidity footprint, which can translate to diversified yield opportunities across layer-2 scaling solutions (zkSync) and cross-chain ecosystems (TAC and Ethereum). This cross-network coverage can influence funding rates and risk dispersion for lenders, potentially offering more opportunities to harvest yields when one network experiences higher demand. On the data front, the current daily volume (~$111.7k) is a key signal of incremental liquidity, which is favorable for lenders seeking lower slippage in larger positions compared to less liquid assets.